Carrelha, J. et al. Hierarchically related lineage-restricted fates of multipotent haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 554, 106–111 (2018).
Google Scholar
Banjac, I. et al. Fate mapping in mouse demonstrates early secretory differentiation directly from Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells. Dev. Cell 60, 1281–1289 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature 439, 470–474 (2006).
Google Scholar
Micchelli, C. A. & Perrimon, N. Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature 439, 475–479 (2006).
Google Scholar
Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. Multipotent Drosophila intestinal stem cells specify daughter cell fates by differential Notch signaling. Science 315, 988–992 (2007).
Google Scholar
Amcheslavsky, A., Jiang, J. & Ip, Y. T. Tissue damage-induced intestinal stem cell division in Drosophila. Cell Stem Cell 4, 49–61 (2009).
Google Scholar
Salle, J. et al. Intrinsic regulation of enteroendocrine fate by Numb. EMBO J. 36, 1928–1945 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gao, P. et al. Deterministic progenitor behavior and unitary production of neurons in the neocortex. Cell 159, 775–788 (2014).
Google Scholar
Beumer, J. & Clevers, H. Cell fate specification and differentiation in the adult mammalian intestine. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 39–53 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jiang, H. et al. Cytokine/Jak/Stat signaling mediates regeneration and homeostasis in the Drosophila midgut. Cell 137, 1343–1355 (2009).
Google Scholar
Biteau, B., Hochmuth, C. E. & Jasper, H. Maintaining tissue homeostasis: dynamic control of somatic stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell 9, 402–411 (2011).
Google Scholar
Josserand, M. et al. Chromatin state transitions in the Drosophila intestinal lineage identify principles of cell-type specification. Dev. Cell 58, 3048–3063 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, S. et al. Eclosion muscles secrete ecdysteroids to initiate asymmetric intestinal stem cell division in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 59, 125–140 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wu, S. et al. Apical–basal polarity precisely determines intestinal stem cell number by regulating Prospero threshold. Cell Rep. 42, 112093 (2023).
Google Scholar
Guo, Z. & Ohlstein, B. Stem cell regulation. bidirectional Notch signaling regulates Drosophila intestinal stem cell multipotency. Science 350, aab0988 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. Transient Scute activation via a self-stimulatory loop directs enteroendocrine cell pair specification from self-renewing intestinal stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 152–161 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zeng, X. & Hou, S. X. Enteroendocrine cells are generated from stem cells through a distinct progenitor in the adult Drosophila posterior midgut. Development 142, 644–653 (2015).
Google Scholar
Beehler-Evans, R. & Micchelli, C. A. Generation of enteroendocrine cell diversity in midgut stem cell lineages. Development 142, 654–664 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bardin, A. J., Perdigoto, C. N., Southall, T. D., Brand, A. H. & Schweisguth, F. Transcriptional control of stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila intestine. Development 137, 705–714 (2010).
Google Scholar
Antonello, Z. A., Reiff, T., Ballesta-Illan, E. & Dominguez, M. Robust intestinal homeostasis relies on cellular plasticity in enteroblasts mediated by miR-8–Escargot switch. EMBO J. 34, 2025–2041 (2015).
Google Scholar
Buchon, N. et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of adult midgut compartmentalization in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 3, 1725–1738 (2013).
Google Scholar
Biteau, B. & Jasper, H. Slit/Robo signaling regulates cell fate decisions in the intestinal stem cell lineage of Drosophila. Cell Rep. 7, 1867–1875 (2014).
Google Scholar
Liang, J., Balachandra, S., Ngo, S. & O’Brien, L. E. Feedback regulation of steady-state epithelial turnover and organ size. Nature 548, 588–591 (2017).
Google Scholar
O’Brien, L. E., Soliman, S. S., Li, X. & Bilder, D. Altered modes of stem cell division drive adaptive intestinal growth. Cell 147, 603–614 (2011).
Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Driver, I. & Ohlstein, B. Injury-induced BMP signaling negatively regulates Drosophila midgut homeostasis. J. Cell Biol. 201, 945–961 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lee, T. & Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron 22, 451–461 (1999).
Google Scholar
de Navascues, J. et al. Drosophila midgut homeostasis involves neutral competition between symmetrically dividing intestinal stem cells. EMBO J. 31, 2473–2485 (2012).
Google Scholar
Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).
Google Scholar
Simons, B. D. & Clevers, H. Strategies for homeostatic stem cell self-renewal in adult tissues. Cell 145, 851–862 (2011).
Google Scholar
Reiff, T. et al. Notch and EGFR regulate apoptosis in progenitor cells to ensure gut homeostasis in Drosophila. EMBO J. 38, e101346 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lopez-Garcia, C., Klein, A. M., Simons, B. D. & Winton, D. J. Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Science 330, 822–825 (2010).
Google Scholar
Biteau, B., Hochmuth, C. E. & Jasper, H. JNK activity in somatic stem cells causes loss of tissue homeostasis in the aging Drosophila gut. Cell Stem Cell 3, 442–455 (2008).
Google Scholar
Buchon, N., Broderick, N. A., Poidevin, M., Pradervand, S. & Lemaitre, B. Drosophila intestinal response to bacterial infection: activation of host defense and stem cell proliferation. Cell Host Microbe 5, 200–211 (2009).
Google Scholar
Schuettengruber, B., Bourbon, H. M., Di Croce, L. & Cavalli, G. Genome regulation by Polycomb and Trithorax: 70 years and counting. Cell 171, 34–57 (2017).
Google Scholar
Steffen, P. A. & Ringrose, L. What are memories made of? How Polycomb and Trithorax proteins mediate epigenetic memory. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 340–356 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tauc, H. M. et al. Age-related changes in polycomb gene regulation disrupt lineage fidelity in intestinal stem cells. eLife 10, e62250 (2021).
Google Scholar
Brand, M., Nakka, K., Zhu, J. & Dilworth, F. J. Polycomb/Trithorax antagonism: cellular memory in stem cell fate and function. Cell Stem Cell 24, 518–533 (2019).
Google Scholar
Veneti, Z. et al. Polycomb-mediated silencing of miR-8 is required for maintenance of intestinal stemness in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Commun. 15, 1924 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schmitges, F. W. et al. Histone methylation by PRC2 is inhibited by active chromatin marks. Mol. Cell 42, 330–341 (2011).
Google Scholar
Tie, F. et al. CBP-mediated acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 antagonizes Drosophila Polycomb silencing. Development 136, 3131–3141 (2009).
Google Scholar
McKay, D. J. et al. Interrogating the function of metazoan histones using engineered gene clusters. Dev. Cell 32, 373–386 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhang, W. et al. Probing the function of metazoan histones with a systematic library of H3 and H4 Mutants. Dev. Cell 48, 406–419 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gunesdogan, U., Jackle, H. & Herzig, A. A genetic system to assess in vivo the functions of histones and histone modifications in higher eukaryotes. EMBO Rep. 11, 772–776 (2010).
Google Scholar
Coleman, R. T. & Struhl, G. Causal role for inheritance of H3K27me3 in maintaining the OFF state of a Drosophila HOX gene. Science 356, eaai8236 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liefke, R. et al. Histone demethylase KDM5A is an integral part of the core Notch–RBP-J repressor complex. Genes Dev. 24, 590–601 (2010).
Google Scholar
Schwanbeck, R. The role of epigenetic mechanisms in Notch signaling during development. J. Cell. Physiol. 230, 969–981 (2015).
Google Scholar
Guenin, L. et al. Spatio-temporal expression of Prospero is finely tuned to allow the correct development and function of the nervous system in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 304, 62–74 (2007).
Google Scholar
Zeng, X., Chauhan, C. & Hou, S. X. Characterization of midgut stem cell- and enteroblast-specific Gal4 lines in Drosophila. Genesis 48, 607–611 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 1930 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, Z. et al. A switch in tissue stem cell identity causes neuroendocrine tumors in Drosophila gut. Cell Rep. 30, 1724–1734 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, C., Guo, X., Dou, K., Chen, H. & Xi, R. Ttk69 acts as a master repressor of enteroendocrine cell specification in Drosophila intestinal stem cell lineages. Development 142, 3321–3331 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yin, C. & Xi, R. A phyllopod-mediated feedback loop promotes intestinal stem cell enteroendocrine commitment in Drosophila. Stem Cell Rep. 10, 43–57 (2018).
Google Scholar
Reinberg, D. & Vales, L. D. Chromatin domains rich in inheritance. Science 361, 33–34 (2018).
Google Scholar
Obniski, R., Sieber, M. & Spradling, A. C. Dietary lipids modulate Notch signaling and influence adult intestinal development and metabolism in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 47, 98–111 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yu, Z. et al. Nutrient-sensing alteration leads to age-associated distortion of intestinal stem cell differentiating direction. Nat. Commun. 15, 9243 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, L., Si, G., Huang, J., Samuel, A. D. T. & Perrimon, N. Mechanical regulation of stem-cell differentiation by the stretch-activated Piezo channel. Nature 555, 103–106 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gao, J. et al. Dietary l-Glu sensing by enteroendocrine cells adjusts food intake via modulating gut PYY/NPF secretion. Nat. Commun. 15, 3514 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lin, H.-H. et al. A nutrient-specific gut hormone arbitrates between courtship and feeding. Nature 602, 632–638 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vo, L. T. et al. Regulation of embryonic haematopoietic multipotency by EZH1. Nature 553, 506–510 (2018).
Google Scholar
Meng, Y. & Nerlov, C. Epigenetic regulation of hematopoietic stem cell fate. Trends Cell Biol. 35, 217–229 (2025).
Google Scholar
Holsopple, J. M., Cook, K. R. & Popodi, E. M. Enteroendocrine cell expression of split-GAL4 drivers bearing regulatory sequences associated with panneuronally expressed genes in Drosophila melanogaster. MicroPubl. Biol. https://doi.org/10.17912/micropub.biology.000628 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hay, B. A., Wolff, T. & Rubin, G. M. Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in Drosophila. Development 120, 2121–2129 (1994).
Google Scholar
Hay, B. A., Wassarman, D. A. & Rubin, G. M. Drosophila homologs of baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis proteins function to block cell death. Cell 83, 1253–1262 (1995).
Google Scholar
Kidd, S., Lieber, T. & Young, M. W. Ligand-induced cleavage and regulation of nuclear entry of Notch in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Genes Dev. 12, 3728–3740 (1998).
Google Scholar
Harrison, D. A. & Perrimon, N. Simple and efficient generation of marked clones in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 3, 424–433 (1993).
Google Scholar
Ohno, K., McCabe, D., Czermin, B., Imhof, A. & Pirrotta, V. ESC, ESCL and their roles in Polycomb group mechanisms. Mech. Dev. 125, 527–541 (2008).
Google Scholar
Dura, J. M. et al. A complex genetic locus, polyhomeotic, is required for segmental specification and epidermal development in D. melanogaster. Cell 51, 829–839 (1987).
Google Scholar
Guo, X. et al. The cellular diversity and transcription factor code of Drosophila enteroendocrine cells. Cell Rep. 29, 4172–4185 (2019).
Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Han, Y., Jiang, Q. & Dong, T. Code for regional fitting the symmetric division ratio. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31311136 (2026).
Guo, Z., Jiang, Q., Han, Y. & Dong, T. Code for EEC proportion simulation. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31311127 (2026).
Guo, Z. CUT_Tag codes and files. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29569391 (2025).
Guo, Z., Yuan, Q. & Dong, T. R code for data visualization. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32617422 (2026).
Source:
www.nature.com
