Michalet, R. et al. Competition, facilitation and environmental severity shape the relationship between local and regional species richness in plant communities. Ecography 38, 335–345 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bertness, M. D. & Callaway, R. Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 191–193 (1994).
Google Scholar
Callaway, R. M. et al. Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417, 844–848 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kalyuzhny, M., Lake, J. K., Wright, S. J. & Ostling, A. M. Pervasive within-species spatial repulsion among adult tropical trees. Science 381, 563–568 (2023).
Google Scholar
Michalet, R., Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Y., Maalouf, J. P. & Lortie, C. J. Two alternatives to the stress-gradient hypothesis at the edge of life: the collapse of facilitation and the switch from facilitation to competition. J. Veg. Sci. 25, 609–613 (2014).
Google Scholar
von Humboldt, A. & Bonpland, A. Essai sur la Géographie des Plantes: Accompagneé d’un Tableau Physique des Régions Équinoxiales, Fondé sur des Mesures Exécutées, Depuis le Dixième Degré de Latitude Boréale Jusqu’au Dixième Degré de Latitude Australe, Pendant les Années (Levrault, 1805).
Willig, M. R., Kaufman, D. M. & Stevens, R. D. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 273–309 (2003).
Google Scholar
Sabatini, F. M. et al. Global patterns of vascular plant alpha diversity. Nat. Commun. 13, 4683 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sutherland, W. J. et al. Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. J. Ecol. 101, 58–67 (2013).
Google Scholar
Pianka, E. R. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am. Nat. 100, 33–46 (1966).
Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., Royand, K. & Valentine, J. W. Out of the tropics: evolutionary dynamics of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Science 314, 102–106 (2006).
Google Scholar
Condamine, F. L., Sperling, F. A. H., Wahlberg, N., Rasplus, J. Y. & Kergoat, G. J. What causes latitudinal gradients in species diversity? Evolutionary processes and ecological constraints on swallowtail biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 15, 267–277 (2012).
Google Scholar
Davidowitz, G. & Rosenzweig, M. L. The latitudinal gradient of species diversity among North American grasshoppers (Acrididae) within a single habitat: a test of the spatial heterogeneity hypothesis. J. Biogeogr. 25, 553–560 (1998).
Google Scholar
Colwell, R. K. & Hurtt, G. C. Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious rapoport effect. Am. Nat. 144, 570–595 (1994).
Google Scholar
Roesti, M. et al. Pelagic fish predation is stronger at temperate latitudes than near the equator. Nat. Commun. 11, 1527 (2020).
Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am. Nat. 104, 501 (1970).
Google Scholar
Schemske, D. W. & Mittelbach, G. G. ‘Latitudinal gradients in species diversity’: reflections on Pianka’s 1966 article and a look forward. Am. Nat. 189, 599–603 (2017).
Google Scholar
Pontarp, M. et al. The latitudinal diversity gradient: novel understanding through mechanistic eco-evolutionary models. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 211–223 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zvereva, E. L. & Kozlov, M. V. Latitudinal gradient in the intensity of biotic interactions in terrestrial ecosystems: sources of variation and differences from the diversity gradient revealed by meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 24, 2506–2520 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235, 167–171 (1987).
Google Scholar
Cornell, H. V. & Lawton, J. H. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 1–12 (1992).
Google Scholar
He, F., Gaston, K. J., Connor, E. F. & Srivastava, D. S. The local–regional relationship: immigration, extinction, and scale. Ecology 86, 360–365 (2005).
Google Scholar
Song, X. & Corlett, R. T. Enemies mediate distance- and density-dependent mortality of tree seeds and seedlings: a meta-analysis of fungicide, insecticide and exclosure studies. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20202352 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hülsmann, L. et al. Latitudinal patterns in stabilizing density dependence of forest communities. Nature 627, 564–571 (2024).
Google Scholar
Michalet, R., Delerue, F., Liancourt, P. & Pugnaire, F. I. Are complementarity effects of species richness on productivity the strongest in species-rich communities? J. Ecol. 109, 2038–2046 (2021).
Google Scholar
Coomes, D. A., Kunstler, G., Canham, C. D. & Wright, E. A greater range of shade-tolerance niches in nutrient-rich forests: an explanation for positive richness–productivity relationships? J. Ecol. 97, 705–717 (2009).
Google Scholar
Michalet, R., Nemer, D. & Delerue, F. Canopy buffering effects against climatic extremes of deciduous broad-leaved forests are higher on calcareous than siliceous bedrocks. Oikos 2023, e09755 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Huang, S. & He, F. Half-century evidence from western Canada shows forest dynamics are primarily driven by competition followed by climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4009–4014 (2015).
Google Scholar
Brooker, R. W. et al. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J. Ecol. 96, 18–34 (2008).
Google Scholar
Xu, H. et al. Do N-fixing legumes promote neighboring diversity in the tropics? J. Ecol. 107, 229–239 (2019).
Google Scholar
Xu, H. et al. Soil nitrogen concentration mediates the relationship between leguminous trees and neighbor diversity in tropical forests. Commun. Biol. 3, 317 (2020).
Google Scholar
Menge, D. N. L. et al. Patterns of nitrogen-fixing tree abundance in forests across Asia and America. J. Ecol. 107, 2598–2610 (2019).
Google Scholar
Germain, S. J. & Lutz, J. A. Shared friends counterbalance shared enemies in old forests. Ecology 102, e03495 (2021).
Google Scholar
Birch, J. D., Simard, S. W., Beiler, K. J. & Karst, J. Beyond seedlings: ectomycorrhizal fungal networks and growth of mature Pseudotsuga menziesii. J. Ecol. 109, 806–818 (2021).
Google Scholar
Montesinos-Navarro, A., Valiente-Banuet, A. & Verdú, M. Mycorrhizal symbiosis increases the benefits of plant facilitative interactions. Ecography 42, 447–455 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. et al. Plant-soil feedbacks and mycorrhizal type influence temperate forest population dynamics. Science 355, 181–184 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tedersoo, L., Bahram, M. & Zobel, M. How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology. Science 367, eaba1223 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhong, Y. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees influence the latitudinal beta-diversity gradient of tree communities in forests worldwide. Nat. Commun. 12, 3137 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wiegand, T. et al. Latitudinal scaling of aggregation with abundance and coexistence in forests. Nature 640, 967–973 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fichtner, A., Forrester, D. I., Härdtle, W., Sturm, K. & von Oheimb, G. Facilitative-competitive interactions in an old-growth forest: the importance of large-diameter trees as benefactors and stimulators for forest community assembly. PLoS One 10, e0120335 (2015).
Google Scholar
De Frenne, P. et al. Global buffering of temperatures under forest canopies. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 744–749 (2019).
Google Scholar
Körner, C. Plant adaptation to cold climates. F1000Res. 5, 2769 (2016).
Blumstein, M., Gersony, J., Martínez-Vilalta, J. & Sala, A. Global variation in nonstructural carbohydrate stores in response to climate. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29, 1854–1869 (2023).
Google Scholar
Allesina, S. & Levine, J. M. A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5638–5642 (2011).
Google Scholar
Åkesson, A. et al. The importance of species interactions in eco-evolutionary community dynamics under climate change. Nat. Commun. 12, 4759 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pinsky, M. L. Species coexistence through competition and rapid evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2407–2409 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schemske, D. W., Mittelbach, G. G., Cornell, H. V., Sobel, J. M. & Roy, K. Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 245–269 (2009).
Google Scholar
Brooker, R. W. & Callaghan, T. V. The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model. Oikos 81, 196–207 (1998).
Google Scholar
Pugnaire, F. Positive Plant Interactions and Community Dynamics (CRC, 2010).
Detto, M. & Pacala, S. Integrating conspecifics negative density dependence, successional and evolutionary dynamics: towards a theory of forest diversity. Commun. Biol. 7, 1572 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wiegand, T., Gunatilleke, C. V. S., Gunatilleke, I. A. U. N. & Huth, A. How individual species structure diversity in tropical forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19029–19033 (2007).
Google Scholar
Kraft, N. J. B. & Ackerly, D. D. in Ecology and the Environment Vol. 8 (ed. Monson, R.) 67–88 (Springer, 2014).
Mittelbach, G. G. & Schemske, D. W. Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on community assembly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 241–247 (2015).
Google Scholar
Maestre, F. T. & Cortina, J. Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, S331–S333 (2004).
Google Scholar
Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–76 (2001).
Google Scholar
Wright, A. J., Wardle, D. A., Callaway, R. & Gaxiola, A. The overlooked role of facilitation in biodiversity experiments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 383–390 (2017).
Google Scholar
Barry, K. E. et al. The future of complementarity: disentangling causes from consequences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 167–180 (2019).
Google Scholar
Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment. Atlas of the Biosphere. University of Wisconsin-Madison https://sage.nelson.wisc.edu/data-and-models/atlas-of-the-biosphere/ (2026).
Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. et al. CTFS-ForestGEO: a worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 1365–2486 (2015).
Google Scholar
Global Soil Data Task Group. Global Gridded Surfaces of Selected Soil Characteristics (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2000).
van den Hoogen, J. et al. Global soil temperature code and data. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558663 (2021).
ESA Climate Office. Soil Moisture. ESA https://climate.esa.int/en/projects/soil-moisture/ (2026).
Jump, A. S., Mátyás, C. & Peñuelas, J. The altitude-for-latitude disparity in the range retractions of woody species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 694–701 (2009).
Google Scholar
Macarthur, R. & Levins, R. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101, 377–385 (1967).
Google Scholar
Barnes, D. K. A. Polarization of competition increases with latitude. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2061–2069 (2002).
Google Scholar
Adler, P. B. et al. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1319–1329 (2018).
Google Scholar
Detto, M. & Muller-Landau, H. C. Stabilization of species coexistence in spatial models through the aggregation–segregation effect generated by local dispersal and nonspecific local interactions. Theor. Popul. Biol. 112, 97–108 (2016).
Google Scholar
Detto, M. mdetto / Positive-Interactions. GitHub http://github.com/mdetto/positive-interactions (2026).
Detto, M. The relative importance of competition and facilitation in explaining latitudinal gradient of tree diversity. Code Ocean https://codeocean.com/capsule/4844196/tree (2026).
Source:
www.nature.com
