NYC judge declines to dismiss case in 1979 disappearance of Jewish boy Etan Patz

Share

NEW YORK (AP) — The murder case surrounding the 1979 disappearance of Etan Patz, a 6-year-old Jewish boy, is on track for a third trial, after a judge declined Friday to dismiss charges against the onetime New York shop clerk charged with abducting and killing the boy on his way to school.

The man, Pedro Hernandez, 65, has been behind bars since his 2012 arrest. He is due back in court in June for a status update. A trial date has not yet been set.

Etan’s disappearance — on a two-block walk to his school bus stop on the first day his mom let him go unaccompanied — became one of the United States’ most well-known missing child cases. He was among the first vanished kids to be pictured on milk cartons, and the May 25 anniversary of his disappearance became National Missing Children’s Day. His parents’ advocacy helped enhance law enforcement’s response to such cases.

A trial date has not yet been set in the wake of New York Judge Michele Rodney’s ruling. Hernandez will be in court in June for a status update.

Hernandez, now 65, was a 19-year-old corner store clerk in Etan’s neighborhood, and he was among many locals police met and interviewed in the immediate aftermath of the boy’s disappearance. But they didn’t suspect him then.

More than three decades of frustrating, inconclusive investigation followed. For years, authorities eyed another man who was never charged. Then, in 2012, investigators got a tip that Hernandez had told various people in his life years ago that he’d killed a child or young man in New York.

Pedro Hernandez appears in a Manhattan criminal court in New York on November 15, 2012. Hernandez, a former store clerk, was convicted on February 14, 2017, in one of the nation’s most haunting missing-child cases, nearly 38 years after Etan Patz disappeared while heading to his school bus stop. (AP Photo/Louis Lanzano, Pool, File)

Hernandez then told police — after seven hours of questioning and before being told he had a right to remain silent — that he had strangled Etan in the shop basement after enticing him there with the offer of a soda. Hernandez was later read his rights and recapped his statement on video, telling authorities: “Something just took over me.”

Defense lawyers said all of Hernandez’s admissions amounted to the imaginings of a mentally ill and intellectually limited man, haunted and confused by a highly publicized tragedy that had happened near his workplace.

“The delusion, now squarely implanted with the image of Etan Patz, is, to him, an event as seemingly real as any of our most vivid memories,” defense lawyers Harvey Fishbein and Alice Fontier wrote in court papers recently.

His 2015 trial ended in a jury deadlock, a 2017 retrial yielded a conviction, and then a federal appeals court overturned the verdict. The court said the 2017 trial judge mishandled a jury question about determining the validity of Hernandez’s confessions.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office pledged to retry the case but also asked the US Supreme Court to restore Hernandez’s conviction. The high court isn’t obliged to hear the case and hasn’t yet said whether it will.

A flyer distributed by the New York Police Department of Etan Patz, who vanished in New York on May 25, 1979. (photo credit: courtesy NYPD/AP)
A flyer distributed by the New York Police Department of Etan Patz, who vanished in New York on May 25, 1979. (photo credit: courtesy NYPD/AP)

Meanwhile, Hernandez’s lawyers asked Rodney to toss out the charges. The defense contended that prosecutors waited too long to charge Hernandez and that he can’t get a fair trial now that some witnesses have died, others’ memories have faded, and prospective jurors have been steeped in decades of publicity about the case, plus coverage of the two prior trials.

Prosecutors called the arguments baseless. Once police got “a direct, reliable tip,” they arrested Hernandez two weeks later, and witnesses’ patchy memories are “simply the nature of a criminal trial,” Assistant District Attorney Sarah Marquez wrote in court papers.


You appreciate our wartime journalism

You clearly find our careful reporting of the Iran war valuable, at a time when facts are often distorted and news coverage often lacks context.

Your support is essential to continue our work. We want to continue delivering the professional journalism you value, even as the demands on our newsroom have grown dramatically during this ongoing conflict.

So today, please consider joining our reader support group, The Times of Israel Community. For as little as $6 a month you’ll become our partners while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

Thank you,David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel


Join Our Community


Join Our Community

Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this


Source:

www.timesofisrael.com

Advertisementspot_img

Read more

Latest News